Wednesday, May 22, 2019

Semester II Final

Part A:
1. Before doing any research, I predict the three most highly ranked presidents will be Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, and Obama, while the three worst presidents might be JFK, Nixon, and Hoover.

2. The top four presidents were Lincoln, Washington, FDR, and Roosevelt T. Four and Five seem to be Roosevelt T. and Truman.

3. Looking at it some more I saw that L. B. Johnson was the 10th highest president for the 2000 survey, and 2017 survey, and was only moved to 11th for the 2009 survey. George H. W. Bush was 20th in the survey for the 2000 and 2017 survey, with 18th in the 2009 survey, and Jefferson was voted as the 7th highest for all three Surveys.

4. After looking at the survey participant list, I saw that all the participant were educated enough to make good judgement calls, If the survey did not have this, the survey itself could be subject to bias in it's votes and could risk having an outcome that was not supported by facts.

5. The Survey used the following criteria as a way to judge the effectiveness of the presidents,  "Public Persuasion," "Crisis Leadership," "Economic Management," "Moral Authority," "International Relations," "Administrative Skills," "Relations with Congress," "Vision/Setting An Agenda," "Pursued Equal Justice for All," and "Performance Within the Context of His Times."

6. The Survey weighted all the categories the same, not letting any count more than the other.

7. If I were conducting the Survey, I would weight Crisis Leadership, International Relations, and Economic Management more than the other categories, because these are important features that a president should have going into office, and what we should look at when seeing of the president was successful or not.

8. My initial predictions were fairly close to spot on. My top three worst were as much as my best, but my best I judged off of who had accomplished something that in a way changed the course of history, which is why I was almost spot on.

Part B 
"On March 16 we celebrate the anniversary of James Madison's birthday. Madison, traditionally viewed as the Father of the United States Constitution, is also seen by many as a defender of open government. He once wrote, "[a] popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps, both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: And a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives."1 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. In a similar vein, he asserted that "the advancement and diffusion of knowledge" is "the only Guardian of true liberty."

9. The Excerpt above says that, As we remember James Madison's birthday on March 16th, know that he is usually seen as one of the front runners of the American Constitution. He's also looked at as a protector of the government, since he wrote, a government without knowledge or the desire to learn will surely fall. those with knowledge will always lead those without it, and those who lead themselves only must use the strength that knowledge allows them to have. He also stated that constantly expanding our knowledge is the only way to be truly free.

10. " . . . [K]nowledge of our own history is essential in the making of Americans. The reasons for this belief may be summed up under four main heads. History makes loyal citizens because memories of common experiences and common aspirations are essential ingredients in patriotism. History makes intelligent voters because sound decisions about present problems must be based on knowledge of the past. History makes good neighbors because it teaches tolerance of individual differences and appreciation of varied abilities and interests. History makes stable, well-rounded individuals because it gives them a start toward understanding the pattern of society and toward enjoying the artistic and intellectual productions of the past. It gives long views, a perspective, a measure of what is permanent in a nation’s life. "

The excerpt above is similar to the quote from James Madison, because they both communicate the importance of knowledge, and how it is essential to the future of our country. Madison points out that we will only be free as long as we strive to obtain knowledge, while the quote above communicates this same idea through patriotism, and how knowledge of our past is a necessity in not repeating it.

Both quotes also touch upon the importance of knowledge within leadership, or important roles. James pointed out that the intelligent always govern the ignorant, and with that he's saying that the U.S. should always be on top not through force but through intellect. and the quote above is communicating that through the fact that knowledge of ourselves in the past, can help us better ourselves moving towards the future.

Part C

11. This year, I have bettered myself in the art of paraphrasing, along with researching events and comparing them to events that might've happened in the same time period or even to events that are happening today. I've seen the mistakes of the past and how they've effected our world today, along with the effects of one man or whole movements that changed the course of history in our country.

12. From my film project I think that I picked a great subject to research, and that I found a lot of important information to use going into the future. I also liked my paper, I felt like I put a lot of good information into it that tied in events from the war to the movie. I thought the food was an interesting part of the project, and I found that to be somewhat fun, along with invitations list.

13. I found Joshua's blog post on the Freedom Riders to be excellent work, because he dove deep into the heart of the movement, and how this effected our country.

14. A quote that I really admire from America's history, is a quote by Steve Prefontaine. He was an american distance runner who broke many records, not only at home but at the Olympics as well. 
His quote is "To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift."
I find this to help in my everyday life, because I know that I won't live forever, and it's better to give everything I have to everything that I do all the time because I never know when it could be my last time.

15. 
Steve Prefontaine is one of the men I admire most in my running career and going into my daily life. He lived his life to the fullest up until the end and that's what I find inspiring.

Avenged Sevenfold is an american heavy metal band, and while it may seem strange to look up to them, they've overcome challenges that make them the type of people to admire. With the loss of their drummer during the recording of their 4th album, many thought this would be the end of the band, but they overcame their grief for their fans and continued to live out the dream that their friend only had a taste of, and to me that seems like enough to be admired for.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is a man many people in our country today respect and honor. I respect him because while many spread hate around and just tried to beat others into the ground with hateful words or gestures. Dr. King was one of the first to step out and use his voice, not using hate speeches, but by knowing his rights as a American and using them to push towards the end of segregation in out country.

Monday, April 29, 2019

In-Class Write


Lee Thomas
D block
5/15/19

            After watching the film, Casualties of War, A person can learn about the challenges the US soldiers faced during this time from the first fifteen minutes of the movie. The first action scene we see is the unit running away from mortar fire through a booby trap infested jungle. Pvt. Eriksson falls through the ground into a Viet Cong tunnel where he is almost killed when his Sergeant saves him. This is a positive scene in terms of how it displays the US soldiers because it shows the brotherhood, and bond between them. We see a man risk his life to save a fellow soldier while everyone else saves their own skin first.
            After the first action scene, they make the audience believe that the unit are the good guys because they make sacrifices, and help each other. It’s only until after one of their men is killed that we see that we were misled in our thoughts. After the death of the Sergeants right hand man, the whole unit with the exception of Eriksson and a new soldier had gone mad. They make a plan to kidnap a girl from a village on their operation route. Eriksson believes they’re not actually going to do it, but the next scene is the unit sneaking into the village and taking a girl. Now we start to see that who we thought were the heros, are actually the antagonist of the film. From this part of the film, a person can learn that while the US was sent to help halt the spread of Communism and protect civilians, not all of them met this standard. The kidnapping scene along with the rest of the film after is in reference to the My Lai massacre, where on March 16th 1968, Charlie Company killed 504 civilians with ages spanning from 3 or younger to elders in their 70s or 80s. Women of the village were also raped and mutilated with some having C Company carved into their chest. This massacre was fueled by the losses the company had received during the Tet Offensive. C Company was part of the 11th brigade, which claimed that 128 Viet Cong were killed in the massacre, yet only 3 guns were seized. There were no men in the village to be of age to be in the Viet Cong.
The Tet offensive played an important role as to why the My Lai massacre took place. In the film the civilians in the city are not killed, and only the one girl is taken. Having not known of the events prior to watching the film, the audience would have no clue as to what the movie would be referring to.  Within the film there is not talk of the Tet Offensive, while we can see that the killing of the Sergeants right hand man was a poke at Charlie Companies losses during the offensive, no one would know that by just watching the film. This is an important detail because it’s possible that the actions at the massacre could’ve not happened had Charlie company not lost any men in the Tet Offensive. It’s also important to note that the My Lai massacre was also hinted at as I’ve said before, but would not be known by someone who just watched the film with no knowledge of the actual event. The kidnapping, raping, and killing of the girl is our hint to the massacre, but it is only one civilian death, meant to symbolize the killing of 500+ civilians and without prior knowledge the audience won’t make the connection.
I think if the director was to add anything more to the movie, he should add more of massacre. The one girl being taken and killed doesn’t really set the stage for a massacre but had someone at the village fought back which caused a massacre, it might be easier to see the connection between the film and the My Lai massacre. I also think that there could’ve been more than just Eriksson to know about the events that took place and feel wrong about it. At the My Lai massacre, there was one soldier who refused to shoot the civilians, even with a gun at his own head he wouldn’t do it. There was also a helicopter pilot that ordered his gunner to shoot any US troop who shot any civilians. In the film the newest soldier to the unit doesn’t want to rape the girl but eventually takes his spot and doesn’t stand up to the sergeant, which leaves only Eriksson to resist to Sergeant’s orders, but at the massacre there were many men who didn’t believe that what was happening was the right. While it’s a historical fact, I feel like it would be hard to implement more people to go against the idea, and still have the movie follow the same course. Over all, the movie’s layout was all done well, while I would’ve changed a little about the massacre the rest was put in the right spots and I don’t really see how it could’ve been changed to be a lot better.

Sources:

Annotated Sources

Sources:
- Casualties of War



Menu

The Menu of the Vietnam Dinner party will consist of the following items



-Canned Meat
A typical food for all soldiers during the war. Many days, weeks, months away from home and all to eat was canned food.


Broccoli-Quinoa salad with buttermilk dressing
This food resembles the surrounding area because the broccoli resembles the dense forests, and the herbs spread through-out resemble the traps, and enemy which knew the terrain better than the allied forces.



- Burnt toast
The introduction of Napalm into the war was a crucial factor but was also extremely harmful. It destroyed parts of the forest, buildings and homes, along with took lives in a horrific fashion.



- Red Wine
The drink to wash down all of the food is representative of the many lives that were lost, and the blood they spilt during the war.

Exhibit

For my Vietnam dinner party, the exhibit will include the following.

1.
During the Vietnam War the "Huey" was introduced, delivering soldiers to the combat zone as well as evacuating them from areas or evacuating wounded.


2.
Making it first appearance in the Vietnam war, the M16 was a full auto rifle that was used by most infantry personal.


3. 
The M79 grenade launcher was used during the Vietnam war to clear out areas in which the enemy would be hiding. Similar to mortars the fire and explosive which detonates on impact.


4. 
 Napalm is a Bomb that is dropped from jets and planes. When they explode they spread a flame that incinerates anything or anyone in it's path.


5. 
Punji Spikes were a traps used by the Viet Cong during the Vietnam War. They were covered with a thin layer that looked like the ground, but underneath were sharpened bamboo or wood, sometimes covered with urine or something that would cause infection if the spikes hadn't finished the job.


6.
This image shows soldiers carrying their fallen comrade through a swamp to get him home.


7.
This image shows a child, now homeless, after a Viet Cong attack and a village.


8. 
This image captures a man reading a letter from his girlfriend who is at home waiting for his return.


Invitation



My dinner party will be taking place on January 30th, the day of the Tet Offensive, at the American embassy in Saigon which was stormed during the offensive.

Guest List:
- Richard Nixon
While Gerald Ford was the last president of the Vietnam War, Nixon was right before him and was part of the war longer. On top of that he was involved with the Watergate Scandal and it would be interesting to see his point of view on why he continued with America's involvement in the war.

- Dwight D. Eisenhower
As the first president of the Vietnam War It would be interesting to see how him and the other guests would interact over the topic.

- Brian De Palma
The Director of the movie, Casualties of War, because I would like to hear what kinds of questions of comments he would have for the other guests.

- Michael J. Fox
I would like to ask him how he felt playing a soldier that struggles to do the right thing.

- Thuy Thu Le
She plays the Vietnamese girl in the movie, and I would like to know how she felt when reading the story or while acting.

- Sean Penn
As the Sgt. that advocates for raping the girl, I would be interested to see what his thoughts were when he was handed his script and knew what his character was suppose to do.

-Gerald Ford
As the final President of the Vietnam War, I would like to know what was happening at the time from his point of view.

-William Westmoreland
As one of the Generals of the Vietnam war, I would like to see how he would interact with the other guests, and how they would interact with him.

Monday, April 15, 2019

2.10 Thinking like a historian

Thesis: The Vietnam War was not limited to the battlefield, it also found its place in politics. While many felt the need to continue with Americas participation in the war, there were just as many fighting to pull American troops out of the war.

I looked through 6 different quotes, some from presidents, and journalists, and groups of people. Some of these quotes contained reasons for wanting to continue Americas inclusion in the war, while others gave reasons for wanting to back out of the war.